Laserfiche WebLink
March 14, 1989 <br />City of Roseville <br />M I t t &Vt I <br />I bel,ieve it would cause me <br />could, not ble reconstructied <br />they arie at now beclause of <br />west Drivieway <br />a hardship if these driveways <br />in appiroximatly ® same location <br />41 <br />the followiing reasons4, <br />Ii <br />To, makie this drivieway conform, to Rosevillies code, I would <br />have to extended the driveway approximatly 18 feet into my <br />property.i <br />To accomplish, th,is, I would have to remove a very atractive <br />and valuabile 10 trunk, (6111 to 1011 Dia. trunks) mature ]Birch <br />tree cl,ump and a, mature 30 foot h,igh Pine tree. <br />3) To rellocate this second drivewiay to a location adiacent to <br />my main drivieway on the East side of my property is not <br />desirieable b ause it would ble located on top of the <br />natural g'asi service e that runs to my house. NSP has <br />diu,g holes on, th,is line two or three times in the las't <br />couple of years. <br />A secloind car, parked driveway adjacent to the main <br />drivieway would interfere with people walking on the <br />