My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_1128_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_1128_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2011 4:16:09 PM
Creation date
11/22/2011 2:00:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EM aar Lk 2G allu 1!La�n <br /> From: Duane Schwartz [d ua ne.schwa rtz@ci.roseville.rn n.us] <br /> Sent- :57 <br /> Wednesday, November 02, 2011 1 <br /> • <br /> PM <br /> To: Mark Gaughan <br /> Subject: FW: City Attorney Review of GLWMO JPA <br /> Attachments-, Jon's final glwmo joint powers agreement DRAFT JM 8192011[1 J.doc <br /> Mark, <br /> See attached proposed ]PA. <br /> Duane <br /> —Orliginal <br /> Fromm. Thomas Petersen <br /> Sents, Friday, August 26., 2011 11,926 AM <br /> Too a <br /> Duane Schwartz <br /> . MARK MALONEY <br /> • <br /> Cc: Karen Eckman.; Jonathan Miller <br /> Subject*. City Attorney Review of GLWMO JPA <br /> Mark and Duanef: <br /> At our August 18th meeting, the GLWMO Board directed me to send you a proposed revilsed Joint <br /> Powers Agreement for the GLWMO, <br /> Please submit to your respective City Attorneys' for their review and comment. You may also <br /> want to review for yourself before sending it to your attorney's <br /> • 0 <br /> As you know, the BWSR is requiring that we update our JPA as part of our 3rd Generation <br /> • <br /> Watershed Plan update. We were told by BWSR staff that several sections of the current IPA <br /> needed to be modified to comply with current rules, etc. We believe we have accomplished this <br /> • <br /> in the attached revised draft, but having an attorney review to make sure is critical. <br /> You will see that reference to both State Statutes (103B and others) and MN Rule Chapter 8410 <br /> has been added to some sections of the revised Draft IPA. It may be, and it seems logical <br /> that this would be the attorney' s prerogative., that specific statutory and Rule language be <br /> added to the JPA? <br /> We are not attorneys, so 'in addition to review of the new content, formatting may also need <br /> to be reworked by an attorney. <br /> Sorry for the delay., but I wanted to make sure I referenced the necessary legal statutes and <br /> 0 <br /> rules in an attempt to make the attorney's' job easier. <br /> If you or your attorneys' have any questions, please have them call either Jonathan Miller, <br /> Karen Eckman, or myself. <br /> Thank you for your assistance. <br /> Sioncerely,, <br /> Tom Petersen <br /> Confidential lity ® The documents accompanying this transmission contain confidential <br /> 0 <br /> information that is legally privileged. This information is intended only for the use of the <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.