Laserfiche WebLink
V f, "me <br />2 — Selcurity, Reco=endatiiions fior Parking Ramps <br />ROSEVILLE POLICE DEPARTTHENT <br />1e <br />lip orandum, from Chief' Zelinsky to Ms. Pat Johnson <br />February 23,, 1989 <br />30 Liig,htLE (clontinued) — do not want to be effectively identified <br />or describled to polivicie, w i I <br />h1ch will enhance their chance of apprehensio n <br />Also, any area adjacent to a building which remains dark and obscure <br />must be, considered, a ",candidate," for security lighting similar to that <br />used in your ramp (quality),, <br />'The Roseville Police Department does <br />have the prois and cons about the various types of lighting (mercury vapor <br />I <br />vs. H3'*.gh Plriesisure or Low Pressure sodium) should you have specific <br />questions, on this or what studies say the number of foot candles should <br />be at a certain height (say f30-Ve f'eet�) . <br />Again, Pat, without knowledge of some specif lics in the four broad areas' <br />I've outlined as CiOMDared to the, dimensions of the parking ramp and <br />the number of cars itis expected to accomodate, etc. I can only reply <br />in a, general sense without making length attachments to this -Memora-ndl <br />Please make a list of cionce,rns, or specific issues and questions that you <br />wish me to address and be happv to do so . <br />CC: Steve North <br />Roseville City Council <br />I <br />