Laserfiche WebLink
I I , 19&3w- <br />TO: Steve North <br />FROM S: Ron Moorse, Vk <br />iq 1111� <br />Attached are letters, from the RosevI'lle Review and Roseville <br />Foicilus expressing their, interest in, being designated as the <br />official, city newspaper for 1989.i The Roseville Review has <br />$I <br />silerved as the official city newspaper for the past several years, <br />A comparison has been made of the costs charged by each newspaper <br />for the publication, of legal notices. The letters settinq out <br />I <br />these costs, are attached. The comparison indicates that the <br />publication costs are very similar. <br />I have surveyed the various citv departments regarding their <br />satisfaction with the service provided by the Roseville Review. <br />I <br />The Police and Public Works Departments "Indicated satisfaction <br />with the serviice,, The Community Development and Parks and <br />Recreation Departments indicated they are not satisfied with the <br />I <br />service <br />Craig Waldron has 'indicated the Reviewidid not properly advertise <br />Ii <br />a set of public hearings in July of 1988, which created signifi- <br />D <br />cant problerns both logistically and politically, <br />9 4 <br />counciLlman Johnsion suggested, at a Plariks and Recreation Commission <br />meeting', that the annual process for selecting the official city <br />newspaper 'include a commiitiment by the newspaper • proviode a <br />0 11 <br />a specified amount of weekly space for news regarding • <br />city <br />ctivities,, <br />