Laserfiche WebLink
r. <br />TO: Steve North <br />a -! <br />FR,OM*i Ron Mo a orse , <br />�ftjjj 0 76 11�11 oil *3 Oro z P;Iv <br />Attached are letters, from the Roseville Review and Roseville <br />F I a 41 <br />loicus, expressing their interest in, being designated as the <br />official city n,eiw,spiaper for 19891, The Roseville Review has <br />served as the official icity newspaper for the past several years. <br />a <br />I have surveyed the various city departments regarding their <br />satisfaction with the service provided by the Roseville Review. <br />The, Police and Public Works Departments indicated satisfaction <br />A <br />with the serv]*LCie,,, The Community Development and Parks and <br />Ii 0 <br />Recreation Departments indicated they are not sat isf ied with, the <br />serva.ceii <br />Craig Waldron has ind icated the Rev ilew did not properly advertise <br />a set of public hearings in July of 1988., which created signifi- <br />cant p�roblems both logistically and politically. <br />Ii <br />ffe-iob Bliersicheid has 'indicated that the Review has been very unco- <br />.0 0 <br />111perat live reigarding, the publ 110shing of news releases conderning <br />11 <br />ue,creat ion activi ties <br />A comparison has been made of the costs charged by each newspaper <br />A <br />for the publication of legal notices,.1 The letters setting out <br />these costs arle attached. The comparison indicates that the <br />publication costs are very similar.1 <br />