4 January 1989
<br />WS
<br />We Mr. We] 0 ON
<br />Northwest Corner of County
<br />Wi
<br />Wad B and Oxf ord (see
<br />21ketch)
<br />1
<br />2a The Nelsion's, who nowi own both, of these lots,, propose to develop a
<br />new tot fronting on Oxford Street, utlifizina the northerly 80 feet of
<br />each lot., Attached is a survey prepared by Georgi-Schmidt &
<br />Assoiciates, Inc. indicating the, dimensions of the existing lot, the
<br />lociations of the two houses on them, and the proposal for the new lot
<br />on the north
<br />3. The new lot will have
<br />80 feet of frontage and a, depth of 194.18 feet,
<br />equalling a
<br />land area of 151,,534 square feet,.
<br />The remaining lot on the
<br />corner will
<br />have 1,1,396
<br />square feet and the
<br />lot contiguous to the west
<br />will have 1,1,,4,1,0 square
<br />feet. The minimum
<br />of size for a corner lot is
<br />100 feet, of
<br />frontage and 12,500 square feet
<br />of area, Eighty-five feet
<br />of frontage
<br />is requi,red
<br />with 11,0i00, squlare feet, of land area for interior
<br />lots*
<br />was created in
<br />the exact,
<br />same
<br />401 The City's
<br />policy
<br />has,
<br />been to allow lot, divisions less
<br />than the normal
<br />standards! if
<br />such
<br />lots are of reasonable scale
<br />with development in the
<br />immediate
<br />area.
<br />In
<br />this case, there is an 80 foot lot
<br />platted directly
<br />across the
<br />street,
<br />on
<br />Oxford Street., In fact,
<br />that lot
<br />was created in
<br />the exact,
<br />same
<br />manner as the arrangement
<br />proposed
<br />by the Nelson's.
<br />That is, a
<br />third
<br />lot
<br />was created utilizing the
<br />northerly
<br />portion of two
<br />existing lots fronting
<br />on County Road B.
<br />1 0 a
<br />51. Attached is a statement, from the Nelson�s Outlining their proposal and
<br />their reasons for this request,. They, propose to build a house on the
<br />new lot so that they can stay inl the neighborhood and community,
<br />which appears to be, a prime objective an their part.
<br />c"
<br />69, It, would be heilpful, if' members of' the Planning Commission and Coun ��j
<br />review tihi,s property since the location of the existing structures an
<br />the significant coinifeirous tree growth o perty enhances th
<br />development as proposed.
<br />
|