Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Bloom advised that revisions would be included in the next draft and <br /> formatted for easier reading. <br /> Staff was asked to add"maintenance" to the list of implementation strategies. <br /> Cost Estimate and Funding <br /> Ms. Bloom noted that cost information, whether assessable or not, needed to <br /> include the installation costs as well as the City's maintenance costs; how to <br /> identify costs for maintenance, noting that the City of St. Paul assessed for <br /> maintenance costs; and current Assessment Policy of 25% for reconstruction of <br /> City streets, with mill and overlay not assessed; and residential properties not <br /> required to maintain their sidewalks, nor were they assessed for their installation, <br /> while commercial properties were required to maintain their sidewalks and were <br /> assessed for their construction. <br /> Chair DeBenedet suggested that annual average cost be included in the Table <br /> (page 9), with a footnote that that it was included for informational purposes only. <br /> Member Gjerdingen noted several typographical errors on page 21 (traffic control <br /> devices). <br /> Step 10 - Design, Final Assessment Roll and Construction (page 11) <br /> Ms. Bloom advised that she include information related to Minnesota Statute, <br /> Chapter 429, using the City of Edina model to explain the process used; with <br /> further definition needed on benefitted areas as previously discussed. <br /> General Discussion <br /> Ms. Bloom advised that staff would now continue with the next steps in <br /> developing the TMP, using the Blaine model, while attempting to make it more <br /> specific to Roseville and incorporating Commission discussion and directives. <br /> Discussion included the intent of the TMP to address current problems or unique <br /> situations; and future traffic problems addressed using standard operating <br /> procedures to design those projects including public involvement. <br /> Recess <br /> Chair DeBenedet recessed the meeting at approximately 7:50 p.m. and reconvened at <br /> approximately 7:58 p.m. <br /> 6. Organized Trash Collection Discussion <br /> Chair DeBenedet noted purpose of tonight's presentation and discussion time with <br /> various interested parties invited to provide a presentation and discussion in the <br /> short time allotted for this ongoing discussion. Chair DeBenedet noted that no <br /> decisions would be made at tonight's meeting, but it was simply to allow have a <br /> demonstration from staff on a new software tool to determine road impacts of <br /> various vehicles based on their weights; as well as to allow invited audience <br /> Page 6 of 12 <br />