Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING REPORT <br />DATE, <br />CASE NUMBER: <br />APPLICANT: <br />LOCATION: <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br />m1i"Flas <br />North of County Road B, <br />West of Victoria <br />Street (see <br />sketch,) <br />Planned Unit <br />Development, <br />Preliminary and <br />Final Plat, <br />Variance to PUCE <br />Minimum Size <br />3. The cilurrent proposal is a Planned Unit Development for single-famil <br />hou�silinig. It, 'is miolst, similar to the development prio�posed and approve <br />by the City for, Jim Casey on an area further south on Victoria. I <br />46, Under a Planned Unit, Development,, a private roadway can be <br />constructed and owned jointly by the properties served. These owners <br />will be, mem�beirs of an association to maintain the private street. This <br />tiechnique is common in multi-family devel,opmient and is being used <br />more and more for single-family and duplex development. <br />5. Ir. Tramm has submitted largier scale drawings of the homes he <br />anti"c'I"pates, building on the siltes. These drawings were not reduced in <br />scale, therefore, they will not be included in this report, but they will <br />be available at the hearing. <br />61* Attached is a, letter from Mr., Tramm, as Weill as a reduced copy of <br />the development plan that did not reproduce, well. In order to read the <br />plan more effectively, i we have ciopied the text portion of the plan at a <br />