T94awsm
<br />The Honorable Frank Rogo, Mayor, City of Roseville
<br />The Honorable Joanne Clushman, Councilmember,, City of Roseville
<br />The Honorable Verin Johnsonj, Councilmember,,i City of Roseville
<br />The Honorable Alvin Kehr, Councilmember,, City of Roseville
<br />The Honorable Roberti Mlatsonr Councilmember,,i City of Roseville
<br />This was, an iss,uei which was discussed and agreed to by the council,
<br />Copies of these directives were, provided to each council member, H a
<br />anything been con,tra,ry to that which was, discussed and/or agreed to,
<br />0
<br />there would have beie-n objections, raised, by the councilmembers.
<br />NOT ONE COUNCIL MEMBER EVER RAISED AN OBIjECTION TO THE CONTENT OF
<br />THESE DIRECTIVES DURING MY TENURE OF OFFICE.
<br />Regarding the legailiLty of the format for these directives as
<br />a
<br />challiengled a,t the recent publici hearing10
<br />Ao There was no pattern to follow for this procedure at the
<br />timle I was seated as mayor,,,
<br />B I spoke with the city attorney as to how th-is inf orm-ation,
<br />I
<br />should be dieli'vered to the finance director,
<br />Annually, thei council, formally approves a chart listing al
<br />t,he supervisoryi em�piloyees, their classif icat 'ions, and pay
<br />rianges (entry 3ob-riate, etc.). If there need to be changej&q
<br />in the ranges these are upidateld at that time, Further, an
<br />I I
<br />incr,ease would, al,so be formally approved for the collectiv.
<br />giroupi, i,n,cluding the city manager,
<br />It, was determined biy the city a,ttiorney that no formal council
<br />approval was required for the clity manager since his position
<br />was, carried on the chart,1,
<br />
|