|
U�ag,e 2
<br />Council, Action,
<br />8/ 81 8
<br />The committee selected, the following tour engineering firms to provide
<br />the design services:
<br />1. Short, Elliott, Hendriockson,, Inc.
<br />2. Toltz, King, Duvall Anderson,, and Associates
<br />3. Maier', Stewart,, and Associates
<br />4o BRW . Inc,.
<br />1 4
<br />ttele then allocated the design, work among the various municipal
<br />The clommi
<br />[�rojectsi as required. For the City of' Roseville, the ro)ects were
<br />P
<br />assigned, to consulting engineers as followE�:
<br />Co. Rd. B—Dale to 500,1
<br />1i
<br />xest of Rice
<br />Co. Rd. B–iiiiii-1500" west of
<br />Rice to, 15001 east of RI'CP--
<br />3 Hlamliiine�-Larpientieur t1#-
<br />Co. Rd. B
<br />Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson
<br />Toltz, King, Duvall, Andersol
<br />Maier,, Stewart, and Associates
<br />in
<br />Other Projects wilere assigned to BRW and Short,, Elliott'. Hendrickson
<br />0
<br />based upon the cou,nty's, program and, priorities.
<br />it is estimated that the fees for the feasibility report share of the
<br />dezign will, be 20% of the, total engineering fees estimated to be 10% of
<br />1I
<br />the esiti mated, construction cost. Accordingly, the total estimated fees
<br />0
<br />for the Roseville share of the various improvements is estimated to be
<br />$5 1 9 00 0
<br />The county would now like to enter into a contract with the various
<br />a I
<br />consulting, en,gineeriing firms to begin the feasibility report work.
<br />Before they, proceed tio this point, however, they would ask municipal
<br />concurrence in the following areas:
<br />lei t
<br />The consultant recommended b�y the selec ion committeel
<br />1i 0 4
<br />20 Agreement to pay, engineering fees for municipal share of
<br />f ebil ity study. I
<br />3 & mun iq,ci,pal cloncurrience that if the pro3 ect is determ ined to be
<br />feasible, it can proceed to completion,.
<br />
|