Laserfiche WebLink
Frank Rekuski, Case No, 1 O Page 2 <br />'5 The follo ote sih,olwi,ng the eight points <br />discussed. As we undeirsitand 'it,, Mr., Larson was not satisfied with some <br />of the agreiled uploln s�olutioins. Thus, he did not sign the approval <br />necessary for processing the variance as a minor variance, <br />6, We presume that <br />Mr. Larson will be present, at the <br />hearing <br />and will be <br />able to present, <br />his views asp to his concerns. <br />It is <br />obvious that <br />portions of the house <br />extend east, to wi,t,hi,n 3 feet <br />of the <br />property line <br />rather than the <br />allowable 5 fleet. If' a variance <br />is not <br />'Issued, the <br />correct action is <br />to remove 2 fleet of the east side <br />of the <br />house so as <br />to goo nform to <br />the required 5 foot setback. <br />Hopefully, through <br />discussions at the Planning Commission and Council, <br />some <br />resolution to <br />this Problem may <br />evolve, <br />