Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 <br />James Andre <br />September, 15, 1,98V <br />4 <br />completing vital lengths of the pathway system includ ing <br />L in, areas where easement problems or neighborhood <br />obj ecti ions existed. <br />2* Continue, the use of outside funding sources to assist in <br />0 <br />pathway construction including county funds,, tax <br />increment financing, and piathway1constructilon done in <br />conjunction with new developmentse <br />Pi <br />3 Nor Continue pathway, constructi,ion in conjunction with street <br />reconstruct ion projects on county, state aid highways anit, <br />City municipal, state aid ro�utes.. in these cases <br />pathways, would, be built at the same time as the roadway <br />is reconstrucited. <br />Continue a constant funding level, or accelerated funding <br />level for pathway development. <br />These i tieims havie been used as the basis for the pathway construction <br />program for, the last three years,. At the time the pathway system was <br />discussed with the, city council in March of 1986, the recommended pathway <br />a <br />system was outlined as follows. <br />03 12Lq 0 4-.-0 to a P I <br />I I * d, & <br />OR — my "-01'Volp V <br />MILES IN SYSTEM <br />For info,rmational, purposes,i 'three shieets from the March , 1986 report <br />fiescribing the plat,hway system as 'it was presented in 1986 'including <br />these four cateigories is attached. Also, a construction schedule <br />showing pathways proposed, to be conistrucited from January 1', 1986, to <br />January 1, 119912,i is atitiached. <br />