Laserfiche WebLink
4 August 11, 1988 <br />al I a 1 0 0 a <br />The posiotionof t,hei cities in joint bargaining with the 49ers, <br />Maintenance groupi,i who are also above the corridor, has also been <br />#1 0 <br />to increase wages at a, lesser rate than those posir..ions within <br />the clorridor.i In negot iat ions with the police, the cityll posiffition <br />0 <br />has been similar., <br />Two options havie been proposed by the icit2 <br />i <br />A Increase aictual. Poll icle Off icer wages at • lesser rate tha <br />those pos i't *ions, within the corridor. i <br />Limit longevity pay for Police, Off icers. <br />sinice the longevity pay is peculiar to the Police employee group, <br />and, because this longevity pay is what 'is causing the Police <br />Officers to be above the,, corridor, the city has proposed that a <br />dollar cap of $12,87171.00 pier year be, placed on the longevity pay <br />amolunti, Currently,, the longevity play maximum increases concur- <br />rently with the 'increase 'in base play. <br />The city"si proposal also calls for longevity pay to be eiiiuinate,-R- <br />for new hires. This, will enable the city to slowly briong the <br />di 41 <br />Police employee group in line with other city employee groups, as <br />a. <br />the city hil,res new offiLciers to replace those leaving through <br />01 A <br />retirement or other types of attrition. <br />options A and, B have been, proposed to, the union on numerous occa- <br />6 <br />slons. The union has also, been made aware of the cityols Comparablzz� <br />Worth, implementation an, and the ciety's'poson with regard to <br />other posilotions, that fall, above the corridor. <br />I <br />See the, att,a,clhed, letters from Cy Smythe dated July 25 and 27, <br />a <br />19881, landisicating attempts to reach, a, settlement. <br />