Laserfiche WebLink
R.EQQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 8/22/88 <br />ITEM NO,: <br />I <br />The attached letter fromCharles LeFeviere,, Attorney for the city in <br />Kehr versus City of Roseville, adviLses the city that a "petition for <br />review (attaiched) of the Court of Appeia,ls decision has been f ailed <br />with the Supreme Court., This was Previously forwarded to the Council <br />on, August 12, 1,19,88,m .61 <br />ipt III a 0 @to <br />The city has the o ion of filing a response opposing the peti ion, <br />If the city files a, response opposing the petition, it increases th <br />likel3Lhood it wi'll be denied. I <br />The cost, for f"J" <br />i ing a response to the petition is approximately $!.,000,, <br />and $4,000 to $17,,000 for defendingthe case if the Supreme Court <br />accepts it for rev iew.1 <br />This decision to authorize the response needs to be made today in <br />order to meet the f i1incri time requirements of the Court. <br />.ff <br />�i q I 1h, <br />Motion to authorize the, f1rM of LeFelvere, Lefler, Kennedyj O'Brien <br />a a 9 <br />Draw,z to respond to the petition for review of the decision of the <br />Court of Appeals in Keh,r versus Roseville,,, and appropriate $1,,01010 <br />the Contingency Account. <br />5 MW <br />