Laserfiche WebLink
August 7, 198 <br />City of Roseville <br />26610 vile enter Drive <br />Roseville,, MN 51-5113 <br />IMPROVEMENT NAME : P- T- 186 - <br />IMPROVEMENT' NO., : 57-42 <br />1 11 1 2851 Lakeview Ave <br />Roseville, MN 55113 <br />Mary Beth Lieverty <br />196 Knoll Drive <br />White, Bear Lake 515,113 <br />LEGAL DESCRIPTIONI: Rleiling Park S k of' Lot 2 and N k of Lot iE <br />Dear, it a ncil Members <br />I I <br />referenced abilove in the write I formally, <br />amount $2005.019. � Prior e. s residence <br />informed by, my rea"Itior of the pending assessment in the sum of $1580-00. At this <br />time felt the amount, g assumed this amount <br />accurate assessment since the,, amount was, obtained from, Mr. Strong in June 1988, <br />well after the work 'had been i <br />4 1 difference between <br />I not disputing original IU <br />quote $1580.00 <br />figure amounts <br />which I consider to be a gross error in calculatioln by the City of Roseville. <br />i id,o not, f'eiel responsible for'this type of' error and therefore appeal the sum of <br />$425.091. <br />request presilent residents of Roseville have been, provided with two repayment options <br />In fulfilling their monetary obilligation to the, City of Roseville,, I <br />a available M 1 <br />'iY' not desire,, to r 'In full *request sum of $2005.09 be payable # <br />fifteen consecuitive annual 'Installments, a,si the residents of Roseville faay choose. <br />My esicrowed amount of $3160.00 would be refunded agreement.. <br />havie lost <br />r $515.00 '*Interest a 1 of $3160.00 escrowed <br />pending assessment. I work veriy hard to earin a living, Being a single woman <br />Ith one r 1 �' <br />I appreciate consideration of my appeal, and my, alternative repayment plan to <br />resolve the outlined, discrepancy and discrimination. in not having the available <br />repayment options as pries elint. -Rois evil, lei, residents.1 <br />Sincerely, <br />Mary Beth Leverty <br />