Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 <br />12/12/8,9 <br />0 <br />,alternatives may be available for removal and disposal of the <br />canitaminated, so il *if the amount is excessive. <br />I <br />At this time there appear's to be three alternatives available. These <br />a i <br />include the floillowing: <br />1,M, RejectiLng all, bids and rebidding the project in the spring. <br />2 B idding, only the tank removal and replacement with the city <br />handling all removal of. contami"inateld soil. <br />Awarding the b id to the low bidder and negotiating a maximum <br />M <br />volume, of soiLl to, be removed for the bid unit price-40 <br />& 01 <br />If alternative Noi. 1, is, selected,, we have the wintertime to take soil <br />6 <br />borings and review, soil Prof i'les in an attempt to determine the exten <br />p I <br />of the contamination problem,. Howeve,r,i this would involve a delay in <br />completing the, project and would involve, several thousand dollars in <br />additional soil testing'. This is not a desirable solution. I <br />I <br />if the second alternative 'is selected, the city would be responsible for <br />N <br />coordi,nati "loin and removal of the contaminated soil, Thi's would involve a <br />problem with the contractor in terms of coordinating his tank removal <br />and, tank reinstallation operation, Also legally, the contractors may <br />lob3ect to, awarding only a portion of the work. <br />If the third alter ative is selected, again, the contractors may objec <br />n 1 1 <br />to awarding only a portion of the work or negotiating a ced 1 Ming on a <br />parit of the priolectg <br />A <br />9 i <br />Consideration of award of bids 'in a,ccorid,ance with staff recommendation. <br />