Laserfiche WebLink
ff i 31 M <br />Development <br />11 <br />the ilLssuance. of any building permits for the site. The erosion <br />control measures addressed include erosion protection <br />Using silt fences and hay bales? as. well as temporary <br />velgetative. cover during the construction phase. <br />Watr i i # # # <br />r that they recommend storm <br />discharged directly 'into, the Department of Natural Resources <br />protected, wetland 2101Wi which is Little Lake Josephine., They <br />niote that the post development rate of phosphorous discharge <br />should not exceed the pre­­dievelopment ratee <br />We would noitieii that the developler,'s proposed drainage plan does <br />not adequately address nutrient control in terms of site <br />developmentQ1 It is suggested that current technology # <br />IIIIII <br />• # p o water <br />acicom,pl,ish,es # <br />The MPICA notes that in their opinion the preparation of an <br />enviro.nmental impact statement does not appear warranted. They <br />do niote, however, that the areas outlined should be adequately <br />addressed before, development .` staff will <br />assure that all, these items are worked out 'part of <br />design, # i <br />�MMVVZ <br />The Metropolitan Council notes <br />comprehens i've plan amendment f or this development to proceed. <br />The staf f has followed through on _ _ amended <br />comprehensive, pil,an has been submitted to the Metropolitan <br />2. Proiect impact on, Lake Josephine water q2aliotv. <br />