Laserfiche WebLink
C 0 <br />ity of Roseville <br />Page 2 <br />January 4. 1988 <br />Exelcut - ive, Director of the Charitable Gambling Board and that the <br />Exekcutive, Directior believies 'it i,s legal,, <br />My questilonln <br />ig the validity of this concept 'is based upon the <br />w <br />following langualge, i,n 349,,213, subid. 1. <br />0 <br />A, sitatutlory, or home, rule cilhart-,--,Ar city of a county may <br />& 6 - <br />noit, -require an organization, con�ductlng - lawf ul aamb in <br />.-i <br />withi,n its iuriisdi Ict ion to, make an expenditure to the <br />cit oir colunty, except as, authorized under section <br />A6 349,,*16j, subdivision 4 [$�10014,00 investigation feelf or <br />A <br />section 349.212 D% tax to clolver ienforceinent cost], <br />If 4 <br />It seems to me that requiring t,he ten percent to be paid to the <br />a <br />Ci,ty for disbursement by the City is a d1rect violation of that <br />language. The fact t,h,a,t a comr.iittee makes recommendatioris to the <br />C 1 11 <br />ity "' Council concerning disbursemervits does not validatII the <br />requirement that the Payments be made to the City, <br />RAJA.d <br />E'ncl <br />