My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_1205_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_1205_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2011 4:14:31 PM
Creation date
12/1/2011 12:23:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
66 This would generate an additional $700,000 annually and allow the Sewer Fund to provide for capital <br /> 67 improvements over the next 20 years. The base rate would still need to be increased for future inflationary <br /> 68 impacts. Like the Water Base Fee, the Sewer Base Fee is charged to all customers independent of how <br /> 69 much wastewater they generate. <br /> 70 <br /> 71 It is also recommended that the sewer usage rate be increased by approximately 7.1%to offset the increase <br /> 7d"111111 in sewer treatment and other operating costs. <br /> 73 <br /> 74 Storm Drainage Operations <br /> 75 The City provides for the management of storm water drainage to prevent flooding and pollution control,as <br /> 76 well as street sweeping and the leaf pickup program. The following table provides a summary of the 2011 <br /> 77 and 2012 (Proposed) Budget: <br /> 78 <br /> $Incr. %Incr. <br /> 2011 2012 (D•cr.) (Decr.) <br /> Personnel $318,653 $310,837 <br /> Supplies&Materials 52,201 55,301 <br /> Other Services&Charges 306,490 277,800 <br /> Depreciation/Capital 1,105,000 1,26000 <br /> Total $ 1,782,344 $ 1,903,938 $ 121,594 6.8 <br /> 79 <br /> 8o The City expects to have moderate increases in supply and capital-related costs. These will be somewhat <br /> 81 offset by lower personnel and other costs. <br /> 8 <br /> 83 The 20-Year CIP calls for an average capital replacement need of$972,000 annually. In contrast, current <br /> 84 storm water rates only provide $310,000 annually. <br /> 85 <br /> 86 To alleviate this shortfall,the CIP Task Force recommended a one-time base rate increase of 65%in 2012. <br /> 87 This would generate an additional $660,000 annually and allow the Storm Water Fund to provide for <br /> 88 capital improvements over the next 20 years as well as increased operating costs. The base rate would still <br /> 89 need to be increased for future inflationary impacts. <br /> 90 <br /> 9,1 Recycling Operations <br /> 9d"'? The recycling operation provides for the contracted curbside recycling pickup throughout the City. The <br /> 93 primary operating cost is the amounts paid to a contractor to pickup recycling materials. The following <br /> 94 table provides a summary of the 2011 and 2012 (Proposed) Budget: <br /> 95 <br /> $Incr. %Incr. <br /> 2011 2012 (D•cr.) (Decr.) <br /> Personnel $32,769 $31,581 <br /> Supplies&Materials 401 400 <br /> Other Services&Charges 23,410 24,910 <br /> Contract Pickup 435,000 468,000 <br /> Total $491,580 $524,891 $33,311 6.8 <br /> 96 <br /> 97 The City expects to have moderate increases in contract pickup costs as set forth in the current contract. <br /> 98 The contractual agreement with the recycling contractor specifies that the City is to receive a portion of the <br /> 99 monies generated from the re-sale of recycled materials. This is expected to generate approximately <br /> Page 3 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.