Laserfiche WebLink
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillililllillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillililllillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillililllillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillililllillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillililllillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillililllillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillililllillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillililllillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillililllillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillililllillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillililllillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillililllillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillililllillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillililllillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillililllillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillililllillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillililllillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillililllillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillI <br /> City of Attachment D <br /> Try T 2012 Budget Fact Sheet <br /> VIlAwd j <br /> Min�� t SSA <br /> October 17 2011 <br /> General Comments Regarding Changes to the <br /> State of Minnesota's Market Value Homestead Credit Program <br /> During the 2011 Legislative Special Session, legislators eliminated the State-imposed Market <br /> Value Homestead Credit (MVHC) program in an effort to reduce the state budget by $260 <br /> million. The MVHC Program provided property tax relief to homeowners by systematically <br /> reducing the certified tax levies from cities, counties, and schools before those levies were <br /> passed along - effectively reducing homeowner's actual tax burden. <br /> Left alone, this would have meant that local tax jurisdictions would have received less than what <br /> they needed. To counter this, the State reimbursed each local jurisdiction by the amount of the <br /> levy reduction. Collectively, this amounted to $260 million statewide. In effect, the State of <br /> Minnesota was using state-derived income and sales taxes to pay for a share of the local taxpayer <br /> burden. <br /> Since the MVHC program's inception in 2002, the State provided full reimbursement to cities <br /> like Roseville in only 2 of the 10 years of the Program's inception. This meant that Roseville <br /> was shortchanged in 8 out of the past 10 years. To compensate for the State's delinquency, the <br /> City of Roseville made permanent budget reductions and drew upon cash reserves. Many other <br /> cities did the same. This economic reality was the impetus for the 2011 change in the law. <br /> In response, the State replaced the MVHC program with a Market Value Exclusion (MVE) <br /> program beginning in 2012. Rather than giving homeowner's a direct credit against their tax <br /> bill, the State will now exclude a portion of your home's value for tax purposes. In other words, <br /> the value of your home will be artificially lowered for purposes of determining your tax burden. <br /> While the change to the MVE program was intended to be largely neutral from the homeowner's <br /> perspective, the reality is that most homeowners in Roseville will see a larger tax bill under the <br /> new law. A median-valued home could see an increase of $11 per month in city taxes — even <br /> thought the City itself did absolutely nothing different. <br /> The reason is that the City's overall tax base shrinks (again, artificially), which in turn increases <br /> the City's tax rate holding all other factors constant. In other words, the exclusion of a portion of <br /> a home's value for tax purposes is more than wiped out by the higher city tax rate. This was an <br /> unintended consequence of the change in State Law, which did not factor in differences in local <br /> tax rates or the local tax base. <br /> Homeowner's may receive some tax relief from these law changes through the State's Property <br /> Tax Refund Program. Information regarding this Program can be found on the Minnesota <br /> Department of Revenue's website at: . under the `Individual Taxpayer' <br /> section. <br /> www.cityofroseville.com Page 3 of 3 <br />