Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 24, 2011 <br /> Page 18 <br /> the need to move forward with maintenance at City parks, noting the record num- <br /> ber of youth baseball participants this year, and the difficulty in scheduling prac- <br /> tices and games at existing fields. Coming from a different angle, Mr. Rettke <br /> opined that the City Council was elected to make hard decisions, and while those <br /> hard decisions were often neglected or deferred on a federal or state level, and <br /> pushed onto School Districts and local government, he still supported a voter ref- <br /> erendum to ensure democracy and let the voters decide if the bond issue was the <br /> right thing to do. <br /> Bob Murphy, 1667 Millwood Avenue <br /> Mr. Murphy spoke in support of a bond issue for the fire station; having served as <br /> a firefighter, as well as deputy fire chief, and just having retired in 2001. Mr. <br /> Murphy advised that he had been privileged to participate in the August 2010- <br /> 2011 Roseville Fire Department Building Facility Needs Committee, and dis- <br /> played a copy of the report from that Committee, provided to the City Council in <br /> March of 2011. Mr. Murphy opined that a new fire station is not a City "want," <br /> but a City "need;" and would address continuing reduced response times, a cen- <br /> trally-located fire station on city-owned land; and for those in tonight's audience <br /> claiming that additional study was needed, he provided excerpts of the above- <br /> referenced study, and work of the Committee in addition to the 2008 study. Mr. <br /> Murphy referenced an earlier speaker opining that it was "immoral to have a ref- <br /> erendum," by opining that it was "immoral not to provide public safety" when the <br /> City had the ability to do so. In addressing public comments regarding a prefer- <br /> ence for the City to scale back and study other alternatives; based on the reports <br /> done to-date, Mr. Murphy noted that the City was going from three (3) to one (1) <br /> station while maintaining the same response time; was purchasing and using less <br /> apparatus while maintaining the City's ISO rating; and was doing so with the <br /> same staffing; and questioned what more residents could ask for. Mr. Murphy <br /> read the 2010-2011 study conclusions; and requested that the City Council act on <br /> the proposed fire station bond issue. <br /> Bruce Branigan, 2082 Cohansey Boulevard <br /> Mr. Branigan opined that Roseville was a great City with exceptional volunteer <br /> efforts; and noted that two (2) specific examples of exceptional departments were <br /> being discussed for bonding assistance. Mr. Branigan noted that the City's Fire <br /> Department was highly rated and trained; and its Park Department was nationally <br /> recognized for its system of good parks. Mr. Branigan noted that those were <br /> some of the reasons he and his family had moved to Roseville; and noted that <br /> both of the issues currently before the City Council for this bond issue had been <br /> studied repeatedly and in-depth for years, and had been addressed through news- <br /> paper articles, the City's newsletter, and posted on line — all providing for well- <br /> published information for citizens and discussing alternatives over the last few <br /> years. Mr. Branigan opined that both departments had performed their due dili- <br /> gence in bringing forward the best recommendation possible to serve current <br /> needs, as well as planning for the future and the City's ever-increasing and di- <br />