Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 24, 2011 <br /> Page 20 <br /> going to the voters at the ballot box, including a number of Public Hearings, open <br /> houses, and other public opportunities to provide information to the public before <br /> the election. Mr. Kysylyczyn noted that he had sent the City Council's proposal <br /> to several legislators, and while they recognized the City Council's authority to <br /> proceed, admitted that it would be circumventing voters; and one of the comments <br /> he'd received indicated that some legislators are stepping forward to eliminate <br /> this legislation and authority. <br /> Bill Farmer, 640 Heinel Drive <br /> Mr. Farmer advised that, when he spoke proudly of Roseville, he listed several <br /> reasons for that pride, including: 1) racial tolerance; 2) a spirit of volunteerism; 3) <br /> a great school district; and 4) the overall environment of the community itself, in- <br /> cluding its park system. Mr. Farmer apologized to the City's first responders in <br /> not including them in that list, since he appreciated them as well. In his fifteen <br /> (15) years as a Roseville resident, Mr. Farmer noted that he had done a lot of vol- <br /> unteering in various aspects, and noted the vision required to achieve and main- <br /> tain high standards. Mr. Farmer noted that, in relationship to the parks, the Mas- <br /> ter Plan provided a twenty (20) year vision to restore the character of Roseville's <br /> park system to a high standard; not to enhance or greatly improve them, but to <br /> simply restore them to a basic standard for Roseville parks, opining that this was a <br /> long-overdue and needed investment. Mr. Farmer opined that the City's parks <br /> system had been underfunded over a long period resulting in the current need to <br /> invest a significant amount of money to bring it back up to standard. While rec- <br /> ognizing the differing opinions, and the financial hardships of some, Mr. Farmer <br /> opined that if citizens made a commitment to follow-through with this now, a way <br /> would and could be found to accomplish it, rather than continuing the malaise that <br /> created the current situation. Mr. Farmer further opined that the longer things <br /> were put off, the more expensive they would be; and asked that the City Council <br /> follow through and support the bond issue to fund the park system as put forward. <br /> Ernie Willenbring, 832 Lovell Avenue <br /> Mr. Willenbring opined that, given the amount of public media available, and the <br /> obvious need for the facilities in question, to simply let the people decide. <br /> Gary Grefenberg <br /> As a bench handout, attached hereto and made a part hereof Mr. Grefenberg <br /> provided four (4) pages total of a petition signed by SouthWest Area of Roseville <br /> Neighbors (SWARN)—Midland Grove Neighborhood—summarized as follows: <br /> "...All this at a time of economic uncertainty, high unemployment, stagnant wag- <br /> es, and falling home values we believe it is unfair to ask Roseville property tax- <br /> payers to bear the sole burden of all these proposed initiatives, and respectfully <br /> ask the Council to reconsider their support of these initiatives at their current pro- <br /> posed funding level, and find other means of financing them." <br />