Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 24,2011 <br /> Page 22 <br /> qualified, allowing for a larger pool of potential bidders that would drive interest <br /> rates down further and save the City significant money. <br /> Councilmember McGehee referenced the sliding chart in Exhibit B of the RCA; <br /> questioning if this was like an adjustable rate mortgage, and why the payments in- <br /> creased as the bonds aged. <br /> Mr. Miller responded that this was done to keep the City's annual debt service <br /> even,; and that the longer the investment horizon, the higher command on interest <br /> rates, with interest rates increasing over time, and the principle decreasing over <br /> time; and in total,payments remaining roughly the same on an annual basis. <br /> Councilmember McGehee noted the statement of Mr. Kysylyczyn that the City of <br /> Roseville held $20 million in available reserves, and questioned the actual amount <br /> available and not classified for a specific use. <br /> Mr. Miller advised that the City held approximately $4.5 million in unspecified <br /> reserves, while the remaining amount in reserve, approximately $16-17 million, <br /> and were specifically designated, either by an outside legal entity or by the City <br /> Council itself. For those City Council-designated funds, Mr. Miller advised that <br /> the City Council could choose a new purpose for those funds. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee as to the current interest rate being <br /> realized on the City's investments and the anticipated interest rate on proposed <br /> bond payments, Mr. Miller responded that the City was receiving approximately <br /> 4% on those investments, and anticipated less than 4% interest rate on the bond <br /> issue, depending on the timing of their issue. <br /> McGehee moved, Pust seconded, NOT ADOPTING the proposed resolution (Ate <br /> tachment A) entitled, "Resolution Approving Modifications to the Redevelopment <br /> Project Area and Industrial Development District No. 1 Plan (Attachment B);" in <br /> conjunction with the sale of bonds to finance the construction of a new fire station <br /> and park improvements. <br /> Councilmember Pust thanked those in the audience for their very thoughtful tes- <br /> timony tonight; and agreed that the City needed a new fire station, and not just <br /> due to mold issues, but in her role as an employment lawyer, it was not advisable <br /> to make employees work in unsafe workplaces; and also speaking as an apprecia- <br /> tive recipient of the excellent services provided by the City's Fire Department. <br /> Relating to the park improvements, Councilmember Pust advised that she be- <br /> lieved those improvements were also needed, and especially as she considered the <br /> favorable and impressive public input process over the last 18 months, as well as <br /> over the last 3-5 years by the various work teams addressing park system needs. <br /> Councilmember Pust opined that the improvements were needed, and that parks <br /> were a good place for the community's children to be. <br />