Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 17,2011 <br /> Page 15 <br /> . - ` •° . - : ' ' • - - -. :* - • -. :. That it wasn't completely ap- <br /> parent to him that this was something that those individuals affected would have a <br /> voice in. Councilmember Willmus noted this was a concern. In his continuing <br /> analysis of the traffic study and overall city-wide and regional traffic issues, as <br /> well as the conclusions drawn from the traffic study, Councilmember Willmus <br /> stated that it became apparent to him that connecting C-2 would serve to improve <br /> traffic flow for the area; . - . - - - • • . <br /> 300 vehicles able to use C 2 rather than current routes. Councilmember Willmus <br /> noted that the traffic study showed 300 vehicle trips per day that would utilize C-2 <br /> over Woodhill or Josephine Road for access to the neighborhood. Councilmemb- <br /> er Willmus noted that the traffic study showed that connecting C-2 would not <br /> have a significant impact on area intersections, and that a connected C-2 was <br /> more efficient, better for the environment, and able to move cars from point a to b <br /> in a more efficient manner. <br /> While not taking the initiative to lead the charge, Councilmember Willmus opined <br /> that the City Council owed it to the community to find a resolution to this ongoing <br /> issue: whether by opening C-2 or by vacating the right-of-way; and personally <br /> opined that C-2 should be opened, and if consensus was that it not be opened, he <br /> intended to put forward a motion to vacate the C-2 right-of-way. <br /> Councilmember Pust noted her interest in Councilmember Willmus' reference to <br /> the traffic study and the residents who had also poured over it to find support for <br /> their positions. However, Councilmember Pust expressed her frustration that the <br /> study area had not been larger to include County Road C, the only east/west con- <br /> nector in that area; but in retrospect took responsibility for it not being larger, <br /> since staff had only done what the City Council directed them to do. Council- <br /> member Pust opined that this would address traffic concerns on County Road C; <br /> and opined that she wasn't too concerned with traffic on Josephine Road, but she <br /> was with County Road C based on her observations from her daily commute on <br /> County Road C, indicating that traffic had not decreased as stated during public <br /> comment. <br /> Based on the limitations of the study, however unfortunate, Councilmember Pust <br /> noted that the City was where they were today; however, she agreed with another <br /> public speaker who said the City Council needed to "do something," and not keep <br /> kicking the can down the road. <br /> Councilmember McGehee, as a supporter of safe neighborhoods, expressed her <br /> belief that disconnected streets served to enhance that safety; and based on her re- <br /> view of maps, opined that there were more than enough east/west and north/south <br /> connections within and throughout the City. Based on the traffic study, Council- <br /> member McGehee stated that she didn't support the perception that opening C-2 <br /> would alleviate existing problems on Josephine Road, or perceived problems; and <br />