|
Ar thur Shuster/Ri-chard, Webbl.9, Case No., 18291
<br />One of which i,s t,hiat the development, be setback, 75 feet from the high
<br />water Line of Lake Owasso and that the vegetation between the
<br />proposed development, and the lake be retained to the maximum extent.
<br />This, of course, has been an objective in the design conferences held
<br />thus far, with the applicants and staff.
<br />10, The i site is shallow and because an additional 10 feet of right-of-way is
<br />required to be d I edilcat,ed for Victoria on the east, side, the depth with
<br />which to work , (east-west dimension) * ' i,s reduced 1,0 feet by this
<br />req�uirement,. �Unider these conditilons it, appeared appropHate for the
<br />applicants to request, a, variance for the setback to the driveway
<br />contiguous to 'Victoria frorn the required 1,5 feet to 5 feet. You will
<br />note from examination of the design drawings that no parking is
<br />cont'"' I
<br />us to the setback,, but *'t is the location for, the west side of
<br />the driveway that serves the access, to the build'in�g and the parking
<br />areas, Thus, an application for a, variance for the required 15 foot
<br />setback to 5 feet is propoisled.
<br />111 A nu�r,sin�g home" is listed as a Special Use in the R-3 District, •
<br />therefore, a Special Use Permit, "
<br />is required. The permit relates to the
<br />overall design and function of' the facility an the site. Conditions can
<br />be att,acheld to, s�uch a permit and may be considered appropriate by the
<br />Planning Co miission and Council,
<br />12. The staff has met four or five times with the developers over the past
<br />two, months and have had conversations with the proponents prior that.
<br />It would appear that, the development proposal as presented is
<br />represientative of the kind olf development initially conceived as
<br />appropriate by Mr. Shuster prior, to 1,9,717 when the property was
<br />purchased,
<br />1301 You will also note from the review of the plans and text that the
<br />applicants propo�se to move, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission,s
<br />361 inch sewer line slightly to the east so as to prov'.I*de adequate space
<br />I
<br />for the development on the site., This will be done at the developers
<br />expiense, under supervision of the City and the Metropolitan Waste
<br />Control, Commission.
<br />14a The
<br />proposal 'is for amending of the
<br />Comprehensive
<br />Plan from low
<br />0 from R-1, to
<br />denslity, to high density residential, rezoning
<br />. 0 6,
<br />R -3A t approval
<br />of a
<br />reliquirement,
<br />variancei in the density of 50,100
<br />to 4O spaces,
<br />feet, approval
<br />i
<br />of the parking
<br />and approval of a vari ance to the setback
<br />from 1,5 feet to 5 feet, Appropriate conditions m�ay include:
<br />a,)
<br />Approval of' enigineering deit,ai,ls and
<br />landscape plans
<br />by staffs and
<br />bi)
<br />The development, is constriucteld' in
<br />accordance wlith the drawings
<br />as submitted and dated 2/219/88.
<br />
|