Laserfiche WebLink
"A buildianig or group of buildings of <br />with Usually, but not limited <br />characteristics: controlled access and <br />contain varying g sizes of individually c <br />controlled access, stalls or lockers for <br />the customer's goods or possessions." <br />one or more levels <br />to, the , f ollowing <br />secured areas which <br />-!omp <br />iii <br />mentalized and <br />the dead storage of <br />4i is Ai 0 0 <br />This definiti i on is in use, in the City of Bloomington and appears to <br />define the use well,. The actual wording would be subject to the <br />review of' the City's legal, cou�nsel,, who be, position to approv%. <br />the definition. <br />3s The action as requested by the Council for the Planning Commission to <br />consider 's* Should the use be adde�d as a, Special Use in the Industrial <br />co�nst I <br />Districts' If sop lis the definition as proposed appropriate for this <br />purpose? <br />0 <br />40 The r�equest for this proposal, is prompted by an inquiry on the part of <br />0, <br />Mark El. Casc�i who, with others, is the owner of a piece of land which <br />was partially occupied' by the Ashback Construction Company some years <br />alga. 'The location of that property, is indicated) on the attached sketch. <br />Also attached is a, copy of the letter from Mr. Cascii outlining his basic <br />interest, and request for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance. <br />5. The issue, at hand, of' course., is not, whether or not the property in <br />question should be approved for, such a, use. Nol specific plans have <br />been <br />ep a I <br />Prlared t this tiime, The, question, however, is whether or not a <br />mini-storagell use should be added to the Ordinance so that such a use <br />I I <br />may be considered in any Industrial location in the City of Roseville. <br />