Laserfiche WebLink
UxqOU I 11 <br />1ATE so 5/og/88 <br />0 <br />UTEM NOOO <br />Wrepartment Approval Ma,nager <br />e e <br />Reviwd: Agenda Sect* <br />9 ion <br />Reports and Recommendations <br />It,em Descr iption: Fire Station No,, 1, Roof <br />When Fire Station Noft 1 was remodeled in 1978, new roof* <br />11 a Ing was <br />instialled. which had year warra,nty, In the first years after <br />IN <br />install I atipoin, a, few 'I leaksdeveloped and were repaired by the company <br />at no Cost to the c1ty# I <br />v - <br />Over he past, couple of years, the leaking problems have become <br />progressively worse. Dur3lw-ng the Fail of 19,87 and into 198a,, the <br />company was called numerous tilmes to repair problems. it reached the <br />pol.nt where the company was unable to repair the leaks, <br />The City Attorney, Fire Chief, and Ass3Lstant City Manager met with a <br />1i I <br />representative of Short, Elliott, Hendrickson (SEH) to review the roo <br />si ituatinon . I <br />9 #1 <br />Mlot 'in on authorizing, Short, Ell iott, Hendr ickson to complete the work <br />regard "Ing Fire Stat ion No, I roof as set forth 'in their letter dated. <br />May, 61 F 19 8 8,o <br />