Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />May 2 51 , 1,918 8 <br />TO me! C all ity Counci 1 <br />OROWY i <br />�000100311 <br />0 <br />The addit ionial, three optilcom un its were responded to because of <br />the following reasions .1b <br />I <br />1,o The, county and state are installing o signals <br />durilLng the 19 88 construction yiear. <br />2 The c ity wasi not aware of the abiovie signal installation unt i <br />a,fterithe 1988 Budget, was adopted. I <br />3, Two of' the three proposed opitiicom systems are on the city,' s <br />AI 0 <br />approved (CIP) syistem. The third one is not, but the Lydia <br />Avenue, approaches (both id i recti ions) are a logical addition to <br />the sy'stieim I. <br />4: To nstall the opiti,com systiellm after the signal is installed <br />would increase, the, cost by approxi mate ly $2,000 - $3,000 for <br />each loication.1 <br />The reliquest fior an optiLcom system at C-2 and Snelling was not <br />responded to, because there is only one C-2 approach to Snelling <br />Avenue, and "it is not on the approived system, <br />