Laserfiche WebLink
A <br />, 0 ;01. <br />10 —1 loll <br />1 <br />Marich 12,, 1987 <br />I A, <br />City Count il <br />FROM": Jim And <br />SUBJECT* HOWARD DIAI LGRENIS COMMENTS ON THE PFS REPORT <br />There 'have beieln rieferienicies, by Coluncil members of Howard Dahlgrenos <br />,comments on the PFIS Report and, why the Council did not receive' <br />do <br />them, Mri, Dah1gren has been making comments on why the Council <br />did not receive 'his comments,, <br />After the PFS, Report was submitted to the-City, Howard Dah1gren <br />do <br />expressed reseirvatilons.1 and, indicated, he did not agree with <br />clertain, aspects of' the Report. !This office requested he provide <br />comments about the re,lservat'lon,s/id,isagreements he might have about <br />the Report# The resultwas a sixteen page memorandum ded <br />at 1~8- <br />87' (see Attachment Nol <br />1 <br />2* The staff and Dahl,ig,rien were in agreement on the recommended <br />approach submitted (see Attachment No., 3) to the Council at <br />N <br />its Work Session. on February 116. Dah1gren was invited to <br />that Work Session,, but could filoot attend, <br />Dah1gren is requesting time to, address the Council on his memot <br />dated <br />