My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1987_0413_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1987
>
1987_0413_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/5/2011 3:14:25 PM
Creation date
12/5/2011 3:04:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DAT: <br />CASE NUMBER* <br />APPLICANT: <br />LOCATION: <br />17361 <br />Craige R,. Purdy <br />V <br />Wetween Millwood Avenue an <br />West Owasso Boulevard <br />touthwesterly of Brenne <br />Avenue- (see sketch) <br />The -property, in question, consisted originally of four platted lots, those <br />being Lots 2,, 3, 28, and 2,9 of Block 4, Minnesota Realty Company <br />m 4. - <br />Owasso. The lots,, as you will note from the attached, enlarged drawing <br />of the original plat, in this area, vary from 100 feet to 120 -feet in <br />widths,, with a, depth of 175 f'eet.1 <br />2* <br />Some years ago, these four lots were combilined into a single lot an <br />which a, single, one family riesidence was built on Lot 2. Attached is a <br />copY <br />i� of an aerial photoin <br />, 'dicating the four lots and the existing homes <br />in the area in the spring of 1985. , <br />39 The proposal is <br />simply to reestablish the four <br />lots as buildable <br />single-family home <br />site's. Since <br />the new division conforms exactly to <br />the lots as they <br />were originally <br />platted, they are <br />consistent with the <br />lots in the area and appear to be <br />no problem. 1 Administrative <br />procedure <br />is simply requireid <br />in view of the <br />fact that the lots <br />were combined to a <br />single parcel at one time and, <br />more than likely, <br />for homestead tax <br />purposes. <br />c% A <br />4* We informed nformed that, the existing house conforms to the required <br />setback,, although the structure is not indicated on the attached drawing, <br />The Planning Commission and Council may wish to question the <br />applicant, as to this condition. <br />51* Utilities are available to each of the four lots involved and there <br />appear to be no other conditions necessary pertinent to an action by <br />the Planning Commission and Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.