|
14 -ILUO RW a I s 4_1
<br />:Wff&fk1fl, M_
<br />ACTION ECG.
<br />P'LANI NING CONSIDERATIONS.
<br />"WM
<br />Joel D. and Phyllis Dillner
<br />Northeasterly Quadrant of
<br />A rni and County Road 9..
<br />f
<br />ee sket,ch�)
<br />Approval, of Preliminary Plat
<br />16 This parcel is one olf a series, of large lots that were developed
<br />approximately inl the earil,y 1950�s. The parcel in question is 2.3 acres
<br />and is similar .1in--size to.--others in Inc t area as 'Illustrated in the
<br />attached copy of the 1,11 = 500 1 scale, City base map.1
<br />2a The applicants, in this case the Dillners, have lived in this house for
<br />-many years and now propose to build a, new house on a portion of the
<br />land. They have reviewed a variety olf concepts with the staff over a
<br />period', of time and it is currently suggested that if the land is to be
<br />divided, the method that they propose is the most appropriate way, .
<br />351 You will note from the attacheld copy of their land division proposal
<br />that a, portion 'of' the easterly lot (aindicated as Lot A) would be brought
<br />out, to Acorn Road and would include the existing driveway. Lot A
<br />would cionsist olf 69,7100 square feet or 1,.6 acres.
<br />Lot B consisting of 31,100 square feet, or .7 acries would be on a knoll
<br />of land overlookipg thp pandin-g area lo. the north, The Dillners propose
<br />to build a new house, for themselves on Lot Bi.
<br />4& There, courisie, considerable land area to the southeast of the
<br />house on Lot, A. This land, �h�owever, is, low and', would not be a
<br />bluildablei siteli. That. is why the moist appropriate building area, if a
<br />i
<br />seconid housei is to be built, is on the, land south of the pond,
<br />5. As land values escalate, in the City and single-family lots are in greater
<br />demanid, we anticipate seeing more and more divisions of larger lots in
<br />the City. You will, recall, the division of several, lots on Glueck Lane
<br />within the last few years, i and it is likely that further divisions may
<br />well be seen in that area as well
<br />Be The lot, areas involved in this case far, exceed the land area
<br />requirement. Though the driveway area extending to A,coirn Road necks
<br />down to 35 feet, the lot, width at the building line in the interior of
<br />the lot) far e,xceedls the minimum 85 foot, w,idt,h.,
<br />
|