Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the <br />City Council of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, <br />was duly held on the 26th day of January, 1987, at 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Johnson, Kehr, Matson, and <br />Wiski, and the following were absent: Cushman. <br /> <br />Member Johnson introduced the following resolution and moved its <br />adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION 8089 <br /> <br />Resolution in Support of Rosewood's Proposal to the <br />Minnesota Department of Revenue <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Rosewood Corporation has submitted a proposal to the <br />Department of Revenue; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Rosewood Corporation has proposed the construction of <br />550,000 square feet of office in the Highway 36/I-35W area; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the proposal to the Department of Revenue would generate <br />a market for one of the five proposed buildings; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Roseville is strategically located in terms of providing <br />convenient and quick access to the entire Metropolitan Area; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the presence of the Department of Revenue in Roseville <br />would enhance the City's economic development efforts through <br />increased taxes, image, jobs, etc.; <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Roseville supports <br />Rosewood Corporation in its proposal to secure the Department of <br />Revenue as one of its tenants; <br /> <br />BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City will work with Rosewood <br />Corporation in attempting to secure the Department of Revenue as <br />its lead tenant. <br /> <br />Adopted by the City Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, <br />this 26th day of January, 1987. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly <br />seconded by Member Kehr, and upon a vote being taken thereon, the <br />following voted in favor thereof: Johnson, Kehr, Matson, and <br />Wiski, and the following voted against the same: None. <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />