My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1986_0113_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1986
>
1986_0113_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2011 9:27:13 AM
Creation date
12/9/2011 9:20:42 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />HOFFMAN, CASE NUMBER 164J <br />feet west, of its east property line. <br />This large setback <br />will tend to <br />mitigate <br />the impact, of the smaller lot <br />to the, east, if approved. <br />place was, to allow <br />We <br />suggested <br />to the Hoffm�ans that they <br />discuss their lot <br />division <br />with <br />effected <br />neighbors in the immediate, area. Though the <br />75 foot <br />lot <br />proposed <br />is not in scale with the larger <br />lots that exist in- <br />the area, <br />the <br />160 foot <br />lot, as it exists is out of scale <br />with the 105 to <br />110 foot <br />lots <br />that generally, exist, in the area. <br />the reason for <br />retaining the larger <br />lot for <br />610 The reason the 1,60 <br />foot <br />lot, was platted <br />at this dimension <br />'in <br />the first <br />place was, to allow <br />for <br />the retention of <br />a drainage swale <br />through <br />the <br />propertyq You will <br />notice the, existence <br />of this provision <br />for <br />drainage <br />Indicated on the section <br />map we, attached <br />to, this report. <br />The <br />drainage <br />ciandition has since <br />been <br />accommodated by the construction <br />of' <br />a storm <br />sewer system so that <br />the reason for <br />retaining the larger <br />lot for <br />drainage purposes no <br />longer, exists.1 <br />It would appear, that the question, here is one largely of reasonableness. <br />There are perhaps three choi,cels�: <br />lei to leave the lot, as it 1s; <br />2* to approve the division; <br />3. to consider future, rezoning to a, duplex lot and constructing an <br />additional unit attached to the, existing home. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.