Laserfiche WebLink
DI AUE FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: • <br />4 <br />Basied, on the timie limitations of' the enactiment of r increment <br />district n 1982, I was necessary to have these improvements completed by <br />October of 1986 or plotentilally lose the incrementsi these properties would <br />develop ovier the 25 year, span of the district. it is principally for this reason <br />that the projects were sichediuled, for immediate <br />The city in the last month heel been notified by Ramsey County that with the <br />redistricting of our tax increment area,, these affected parcels now fall into <br />District No. 4. Ais such, they have a, new four -year time span for improvements <br />to be dome .1 It is y t eref ore q possible for the city to defer the improvements <br />to a later date This would have a dual lenef t . <br />The second benefit would be to delay the expenditures necessary and aid the <br />city's tight cash flow in a tax increment area. These earmarked funds could <br />to el+ t aside and safeguaroded, as, well as accrue interest necessary to offset the <br />anticipated, inflation, <br />It, therefore, would appear very desirable, to continue to move ahead on the <br />right-of-way acquisition,, so thiei improvements could be done when needed but <br />defer the actual construction until at least, 1987 and potentially <br />as <br />9 r 9 , If' the council concurs, motion +rI <br />rrIcompletion of plans later s sufficient, <br />RIECOMMINDED CO,U'N'CIL Public <br />ACTIONdi Motion instructing the <br />defer Co III • - o of' plans for ProJects P-85-18, ST-85-"19, a d P-84-15i tio, a later date,, <br />