Laserfiche WebLink
1.ZM <br />The C 1"Ir of Rosev,11le f oirmed its ',Parks and Recreation Department- <br />3 <br />in 1959 and has,, since that timle, been providing parks and <br />recrieational opportunities f or 'its citizens. Through the years <br />the number of programs and the number of participanLs. have <br />a <br />increased dramat icilially. <br />I <br />ii iziens approved <br />Roseville ic t I a boind issue, in 1961, for the purchase <br />of park, land, wl"ithin the community. 'The parks purchased at that <br />V <br />time ith small additions since form the park system as it <br />, wi ri <br />exists t,o,1Mi ay.1 With a, few more addons,, the park system will be <br />complete,, and will, meet, the needs of Roseville citizens 'Into the <br />future,., <br />I <br />Roseville a,dmini,siters an extensive recreational program throughout <br />the year, The,, varielity of' activities 'is intended to meet the <br />needs of all segments of the popula-tion. <br />The Roseville Recreati'Loin Facty Task Force shall study the <br />recreat "'loin facility needs of the City of RosevIL11e, The <br />Task Force shall invest"gate all aspects of the need for indoor <br />0 <br />recreation faicJ-lities,, and examine carefully such questions as. <br />Cian the needs f or recreation programming be met by <br />'Using existing buildings in the community,, whether privately <br />or 1 <br />pubil owned? <br />2. Should recreation, programs be open to unlimited number of <br />participants or, s�h,ould there be a maximum number of <br />AI <br />participants in, programs, biased on the resources available to <br />thF Ciii ty? <br />M <br />3. Should the C ity provide. programs which include advanced <br />skills and competition beyond the typical recreation level of <br />A <br />partipation <br />Should a new City-ownied fac'lity be constructed7 if so, what <br />are estimated constructiloin and operational costs? <br />