My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1986_0519_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1986
>
1986_0519_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2011 2:56:10 PM
Creation date
12/9/2011 2:53:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PATHWAY SURVEY OF APRIL 30, 1'986 AND MAY 39 1989 <br />I <br />encourages The ex istence of a pathway # use the <br />facilifty, by 40-50%, i.e., 1,7'51 users on, existing pathways i only 1,211 on <br />proposed A <br />2. The use is heaiv,ily, weather dependent,, Almost much <br />during a good weather day (1,91,2) versus a windy, cold day (1,050Y. 1 <br />the largest users of the system, 7' are adults (2,153) versus school age <br />children (810 9) This is particularly true for pedestrians where 0 were <br />adults <br />4. There is approximately a - � split between pedestrians and bikers <br />5., There ,. r Potential s . bikers <br />proposed routes, where there were 2214 users versus 252 adult bikers, <br />61. The existing pathways averaged, approximately 300 users each per day during <br />good weather, <br />7a By far the predominate use off'' the system ) was for recreational <br />purposes,, The only other use in double figures was shopping (13%), <br />trips 9,, An, unusually, high portion of' the trips by senior citizens'was for shopping <br />110., The use of the system, for recreational 11 # exclusively by <br />adults (831%)�., Of' those adultsq over.two-thirds were pedestrians, <br />11. An unexpected, finding was that not one f' the 73 hikers interviewed had <br />work as a destination <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.