|
V. CONCLUSION
<br />6
<br />The area l cif financial ability as part of the Commissi"on's
<br />consideration. of' this Request, For Approval, appears to be
<br />* III M
<br />the, only remaining i I sisiue, albeit, an extr�emely signif 1*cant
<br />a 61
<br />facitor., The q I uesitIon of the financial abl*11"ty of North
<br />Central at this stage of our, investi"giatiLion results "in a
<br />policy determination for the Commission and its member
<br />cl, t i ei S, Si It has, been, concluded that, the if inancial pro f ormas,
<br />1 41
<br />of North Central. as presented do not represent a f inan cial,ly
<br />viable plan& HoIwlevIerr North, Ceiriftral has endeavored to sup-
<br />port its financial plan by the commitiments, and assurances.
<br />stated above. Ilt ca,ni be concluded that North Central's
<br />financial pilau biased upon the infoirmati*oIn we have reviewed
<br />does, pIres,eint, a risk to, Mr,.I Hau,s,erI,,, While the risk to the
<br />commisisi"on, its member cities and the franchise commitments
<br />i,s a po.Lia decii,sioln for the Commisisionr it would be my
<br />opinion that, based upon the totialiLty of the circumstances,
<br />the Commission, could not, Treasonably deny the transfer to
<br />0,
<br />North Central,., To this, end, it. would be, my opinion that 'if
<br />the Commissi on or its, member cities were to deny the tra,ns-
<br />r
<br />1
<br />fe basied, upon, the, 'information provil"'Ided, a court would
<br />likely coinclud,e, that the denial was unreasonable,
<br />
|