|
ITEM N . /it/
<br />Dieplaftment Approval a Manager Rev ieweld Agenda, Sic t iI n
<br />Reports is anId recommendations
<br />It'I em Dies Icripition: 19871 Ut l t' Rate AIDjiu stiments
<br />1 0 , These are the sanitary
<br />'The City of Roseville ope,rates th,riee separate utilltiels., I'
<br />sewle'r a 'i�l�ity I the water utilillty,,i and the stiorm dr'a i nags utility. In the lease of the
<br />f iris t tw�o the b iu 1, k of' t' h� Ie city's expenses g Io, to outside a g a nc' irle is i. The �h Ie s an i t'a ry
<br />siewialge lf�rOm h�e c' if t � ������ �� ����at'�'''+d bI y � 'he M�e'' �t r� Po �l it a��n Wa �s�t' a C ��n t ���' l C������i��s's i i� ��n and �t' hI�'
<br />c t u �l� its, water from the Sit. ',Paul �W��ate��r DI�e�p'a,rt�me��nt for supply � to the c :��i��e���nis'
<br />Each of �t �h a iM le organizations � � �� h�'� �is ��i � �rle a� si eld t �h�'e �.' L �� rate � w'�� " ��' � r� the city mu IN��M � Ir � �i� yi in, CAI "9 fir T ���.
<br />The metropolitan, Waist a Cont'ro'l C'omis s'io n has rais'e'd the sewagle treatment, f'e' Ie s by
<br />approximately 3 %' F'orltunat'+ illy during this' Fast ea the city �ra� able to generate a
<br />s'u rip ups' in its, sI nitarly sewier fu nd ,, � using some of that surplus and itak gig,
<br />advantage of , a non rieloc'cu urrin'g c're'dit' the c lty is reiceiving from, the A'CC', 'it a'��Iea,rs
<br />that the clay would not havile to raisle the revenue e level, forll i 9I87 .
<br />Although the o e,rall rievienule from the san,ilitary lewder billings is biro oiled to r�Iemai ,
<br />the same floc 11987 as it w'as' f'o'r, 119 816 ' the various rat'eis for the inId1vidu ual c l'asaes of
<br />users, will change som'ewhat This Its b'ec'ause of a shift in the Proportion of the
<br />vIe ial use y h'e Iar iou s dais ses' ,, " he +rI'�si lent' y'�l fee will, go I �� �omewhat , and,
<br />the cI Imercr al /'indus't,r,l*�a,1 will go u pI sligh ly o
<br />The s'i.�u�u'ation, in the abater fund i�' m 're difficult. uuring, 1911861, it is' priedict'Ied thiat
<br />the city mill actually turn a alight d'e'fiIc it in ihiis fund., As stat'e'd above, in 1 987
<br />the City of St Paul w�11 ble inicrl'easi g it's' r'�.t''�es to the city �� - If the city di'
<br />not in'c'riIeas'e its flees, to Id's' riesidieritsill the fund is preen ated to run approximat'IelY
<br />20,000 of def3Lc1m,t,,i This' obvillousily is not desiriable. In, odder to, minimize this it'
<br />is recommended that,, the c L 1y increase i Itis ra 'es by 5% to matob those we are charli�leld
<br />by the City of St., Paul This would then come vi l� c l ose to ball'anc lng this account.
<br />The s't rm drain'algIe utilit� fI Irtuu�uat'ely i in a Tit Ion, wham' It is not niecleIs'sary to
<br />inna,reasee the fees for 19817s, kit'h�ou gh sever ml projects �plus, Bongo ng, ax�peniis'Ie will
<br />11Icc r during, the Year'q lit is currently eiMM't'imated that th e feIeis ciian be reta a at
<br />thIelr existing leve'l
<br />The avie ,rage inIc reilase, flo r M hIes�e three ut i.l � t i a isr ' I t�h Ie rIef� no r a ill will I only MtiF a 1.661%,., � The
<br />pr ceps for� implemI nt1�ug the 918 fee s'IcheI�lu�ule would be �IrN'o adl pit a rm tion
<br />lestablilish-Ing the accompany:`Lng 11lisit, of' fee rates diateld December, 15, 1986,.
<br />REC+ I,101ENDEID COUNCIL, ACTION
<br />I r �� ' t �e �� 8' sewI�r wa ta r�� and d ra nag I� ut l l l fees I s i n occurrence ur r e nc �e with � Mo IC�, � �
<br />the l il ist diatileid D ie lic Ie mb a �r 5 � 191 18 61
<br />
|