Laserfiche WebLink
CASE NUMBER: 1,579-85i <br />APPLICANT: Norman Doerr <br />UOM <br />2. Addit ional char, es in the amount of $4,517-91 become due upon <br />approval. <br />8 Obv <br />® ons exp d IP <br />iouslyq the oiniresse bvi the nel'.ghbors will be an i <br />nterestin;IA <br />ingredient In the,, decision process, The opinions of the neighbors, <br />howevery cannot be,, used as a "Ireason" for denying or approving the <br />subd iv is ion A finding of fact as to the reasonableness of the proposal <br />9 <br />should, be eistablisheds- The reasons- could include, among others, that* <br />a. The di'vision is' consistent or iniconsistent with the scale of the <br />development in the area. <br />be The, d 0 * 0 <br />iv ision would or would not adversely affect the value of existing <br />development in the areas <br />ce -The divisi"Pon would or would not adversely affect the ecology and the <br />drainage, function relatied to the propertiea in question. <br />