My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1985_0318_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1985
>
1985_0318_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/15/2011 2:50:23 PM
Creation date
12/15/2011 2:48:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 18, 1985 a <br />ITEM NO* 0 <br />A% -0, <br />Department A iprov�al: <br />P Manager Reviewed: <br />Agenda Section, <br />fit Reports and recommendations <br />Itelm Description, Receipt of biilds for tree remioval, calendar year 198-,m <br />Ini Thursiday, March 114, 1985, seialedi b 'lids were received for the removal of disease* <br />tirilees and, stumpis within the CitY Of R1110sev ill ie. Seven bids were received with the <br />following results: <br />CONTRACTORS <br />PER INCH BID <br />B,l,uemel Tree Service <br />$ 5w48, <br />Ceres Tree Co. <br />5w69 <br />Precisilori Landsicape & Tree <br />5,a80 <br />Arpin Tree Service <br />6. 24 <br />Gorecki & Co. <br />8*75 <br />Langers Tree & Landscaping, <br />9965 <br />Woodchuck Tree Service <br />10s20 <br />The low bidder for this contract, was Bluemel- Tree Service with a per ineb bid of <br />$15,.48. Bluemiel was the low bidder for the cilty's 1984 tree removal worko and <br />performed aciceptiab,l' Thus, the staff finds, the contractor acceptable for the award <br />Y <br />of this contract, <br />I <br />RECO11MENDED COUNCIL ACTION: The adoption, of a motion accepting the bid of Bluemel <br />Tree Service in the amount of M48 per inch for removal <br />of diseased trees in the city$ designated as Project <br />M-85-0 1,6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.