2011_0214_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

73 2.2 The City Council may also initiate the process of amending the Comprehensive Plan 74 Land Use Map. 75 3.0 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION 76 Since the City Code does not permit adjacent property owners to petition for a 77 Comprehensive Plan —Land Use Map Amendment, the Community Development 78 Department/Planning Division believes it made the correct determination in denying the 79 petition by the Woods Edge Homeowners Association and Old Highway 8 Neighborhood 80 residents. The property owners at 3253 (the John and Helen Heinz Estate) and 3261 (Mr. 81 Thomas Ranallo) have not requested nor applied to the City for a Comprehensive Plan — 82 Land Use Map Amendment of their properties. 83 4.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 84 4.1 On February 2, 2011, the Roseville Planning Commission discussed with the City 85 Attorney and the City Planner the appeal for Woods Edge Homeowners Association and 86 the Old Highway 8 Neighborhood residents and the action necessary. 87 4.2 At the meeting a few neighborhood residents addressed the Planning Commission 88 regarding the petition/appeal. Although understanding of the fact that the item was a 89 determination regarding an administrative decision by the Planning Division and not a 90 discussion on what the land use designation and/or zoning classification should be for the 91 subject two parcels, most of the residents that addressed the Commission sought the 92 Commission's support for the land use change. 93 4.3 The Planning Commission voted (5-0) to recommend to the City Council that the 94 petitioners do not have standing pursuant to Roseville City Code Section 201.07 or 95 otherwise to petition for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and that the Community 96 Development Director made the proper decision not to proceed with the request made by 97 the Woods Edge Homeowners Association and the Old Highway 8 Neighborhood 98 residents in their petition. 99 5.0 SUGGESTED CITY COUNCIL ACTION 100 ADOPT A RESOLUTION with FINDINGS,, affirming that the petitioners do not have 101 standing pursuant to Roseville City Code Section 201.07 or otherwise to petition for a 102 Comprehensive Plan Amendment and that the Community Development Director made 103 the proper decision not to proceed with the request made by the Woods Edge 104 Homeowners Association and the Old Highway 8 Neighborhood residents in their 105 petition. 106 Prepared b y: City Planner T'homas Paschke 107 Attachments: A. City Attorney Opinion 108 B. Petition 109 C. Resolution 110 PFI I -00 RCA 02141 Ldoc Page 3 of 3