Laserfiche WebLink
C 41 ty o f R,o s e v i e <br />May 9, 19�8�4 <br />P1 aig e 4 <br />The *improvement of Rose Place would require the <br />construction of curbing, medianst posts or fencing <br />along the siouth lot line of t,be Roseville Mobile <br />a 0 <br />Home Park to pr1ohibit free access from the adjoininit <br />Park Street to Rose Place,. <br />2. The improvement of' Rose Place is simply unneeded. <br />developer has, direct access to Lexinqton Avenue and has suf- <br />f IC <br />ient open space for the installation, of an internal driveway <br />Sly s t em 0 <br />4 <br />310 If the improvement of Rose Place is necessary for the <br />cons tr uction of a, 16-unit development, the developer should pay <br />for the improvements, gin, accordance wi'th Minn. Stat,, 9462,,358, 1 f <br />this is economic ally unfeasible,, then enter into an assessment <br />ag,reement and have the developer pay a g,reater proportion of the <br />cost of the project. <br />G <br />4., I�n specific response to the propiolsal to place a cul-deNEW <br />sac on the northern lend of Dunlap,,, 'be advi,sed that any proposal <br />wh,ich conisideirs the taking of' part, of' Mr. Mertesdorf's property <br />N <br />'111 be meit with opposon at every oppoir,tunity, <br />wi <br />5 Due to the lack of benefints received by the Mertesdorf <br />troperty to the 'improvement of' Rose Placeo, and due to the <br />problems, the, improvement would, creatiel,,, Mrs Mertesdorf will object <br />and contest any assessment against his, property for the improve- <br />ment of Rose Place. <br />I am not unmindful of the City's desire to increase its tax base <br />through the improvement of the William Jones project. I am also <br />9 <br />not unmindful of' the additional development which may occur • <br />the property to the weist of Mr. Merit,eisid,orf,, I understand that <br />thie two, pro ects crea,tei planning problems for the City of <br />Roseville,, You arie now deba,ting the, following alternatives., <br />A,t, the Council, Meleting, on, May 77th, a fair amount of concern and <br />• 0 A <br />,,Iscussion took, place in, regards to the future of the Rosevi'llz <br />