Laserfiche WebLink
MEMBERS O�F THE ROSEVILLE, CITY COUNCIL <br />111,11, T <br />91 <br />I would like to pres,ent, my objections to this petit,ion: <br />A. The street is functional. There have been complaints <br />about maintenance,, bu�t Tf my taxes have risen from <br />$100 to $1200 in the, Past three years,, there must be <br />adequate money, for better maintein�a,nce., <br />B. I w,ou�1d 1 to object, for of all the homes in�volved, <br />a <br />1, would, be payi�ng the highest assessment on my <br />121,0' x 140' clorin�e,r l of on a fixed, retirement income. <br />I <br />This i's s,uperfluous, for a, functional s,treet. <br />C There has been any argument that O,xfoird does, not align <br />itself wiith Oxford south of Wloohiil�l. Why didn't the <br />C'i,ty Engin�eeir a,llign the new portion of oxford wlit <br />I <br />the existing street, when there was readily available <br />land on the east side of the newer street.? <br />D. All owners faciling Judith A,ven�ue object to t,h�is assessment. <br />Siho enue be,, a part of' this improvement? <br />PRWECT: <br />Oxford, Strpgtandi Judith Avenu,ei <br />N=e: Ito <br />Owineir olf' Prope�rity at i o2oqi <br />,-rleleplhone No,. *3 <br />COMMENTS <br />�E�V o <br />JUN 5- 1-0'A <br />%OC. I <br />R 11:111 LZI;4 A lkjmr6-.i <br />(Attiach separate sheet, if required,), Please return to the attenti . on <br />Tif the PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEN-1 <br />