Laserfiche WebLink
O:JP;V'I'3* 114A <br />-;Lw'* � <br />0 <br />DATE. 6 June 19U <br />CA,SE NUMBER. 1,5001-84 <br />APPLICANT' el Clomm,ers - Klod,t <br />LOCAT ION A 0 <br />North of County Road C, Contiguous to West <br />City Limitis <br />I is <br />ACTION REQUESTED41, Div2i-is3'Llon of a Lot <br />Var.i,iance to Plia,rk,ing and Building Setback <br />3. M & M Development Company did propose the cul -de -sac and the division of <br />the land i"n question today :Lnto three lots,,, This was approved by the <br />City,,, but prior to execution, the M & M Development Company went out of <br />business,,,, Thus,, the City was left, with the problem as to how the <br />,cul-de-sac could be put together and constructed as originally planned <br />without going into a, condemnation procedure, <br />4. When C1=m1ers-Klodt originally apprioliached the City with respect to <br />developing this property, were not aware of the City's Joint plans with H & M <br />Development company to construct this cul-de-sac, through the Vertimag <br />0 <br />