2011_1024_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Attachment D 1 PLANNING FILE 11-025 2 Request by CSM Investors, ITC' for approval of outdoor storage as a CONDITIONAL '3 USE at 2360 County Road C Chair Boerigter opened the Public Hearing at 635 p.m. 5 Associate Planner Bryan Lloyd summarized the request of CSM Investors, LLC for approval of 6 outdoor storage as a CONDITIONAL USE at 2360 County Road C West for proposed storage of 7' siding and roofing materials in a fenced area behind the building. 8 Staff recommended approval of the proposed CONDITIONAL USE based on the comments and 9 findings of Section 4-6 and the recommendation of Section 7 of the staff report. 10 Member Boguszewski pointed out an error in the introductory statement in Section 5.2.a of the 11 staff report (page 2 of 3)1, and confirmed by Mr. Lloyd that the first "not"' in that sentence should 12 be struck. ) 1': � N At the request of Member Boguszewski for clarification on projected traffic for ingress and 14 egress to the site, Mr. Lloyd suggested that the applicant answer that question. However, from 15 staff s perspective, Mr. Lloyd advised that outdoor storage in terms of land use on the parcel 16 would essentially be the same ad indoor storage; and should create no additional traffic, since the 1 7' CONDITIONAL USE was a permitted use, and this request to move storage from inside to 18 outside,, not to expand their storage capacity, and therefore it should create no additional traffic 19 issues. 20 In Section 5. Lb (actually 5.3.b, page 3 of 3), of the staff report, Member Boguszewski questioned 21 if staff considering strengthening this comment as a condition to ensure widening the access gate 22 for emergency apparatus. 2'3 Mr. Lloyd advised that, while there were some issues that remained pending, it was yet to be 24 determined if any additional gate width was needed; however, he noted that the applicant's plans 25 indicated that the gate would be widened as necessary to comply with City Code. 26 Chair Boerigter sought further clarification on this issue; with Mr. Lloyd advising that the Fire 2 7' Marshal had been unavailable during the initial Development Review Committee (DRC), review; 28 but that the Building Official had indicated some widening may be required; however, it 29 remained a pending item that would be addressed by staff at an administrative level as part of '30 finalizing the application and permit issue processes. '31 In Section 5.2.c (pages 2 and 3)1, Chair Boerigter questioned if more specificity was needed to J' 2 N�3 define aggregates or granular materials. '3'3 Mr. Lloyd advised that he recalled come inter-changeability of those terms in Zoning Code N3 definitions or in Conditional Use requirements; but offered to revise the terms in this context if '35 so directed by the Commission. '36 Applicant, John Ferrier, CWM representative for owner N3 7' Mr. Ferrier thanked staff for working with the applicant on this request; and advised that the ' 8 applicant had reviewed the staff report and was in agreement with its findings and conditions. '39 Regarding outdoor storage materials, Mr. Ferrier advised that the materials would be bundled 140 shingles and siding,, not loose materials; and recalled that City Code referred to loose or granular Page 1 of 2