Laserfiche WebLink
ROSHWEEE <br />1XIEQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: March 2 81 2011 <br />Item No.: 10 . b <br />Department Approval City Manager Approval <br />t <br />Item Description: Presentation on Resident Survey Results <br />Background <br />2 As a part of an approach to engage the community and seek citizen feedback on service <br />3 satisfaction, performance and budget priorities, the City commissioned a community survey to <br />4, examine in greater detail the programs and services offered. <br />6 A resident survey was designed and administered by Cobalt Community Research, a 501(c)3 <br />"7 nonprofit coalition that was created to help governmental organizations measure, benchmark, <br />8 and manage their efforts. Their survey instrument is specifically designed to engage residents in <br />9 budget and planning decisions. The City can subsequently use the information from the survey <br />110 to help improve our service and program priorities, and allocation of' scarce resources, to increase <br />11 citizen satisfaction. <br />12 <br />13 For citizen satisfaction benchmarking of various city services, the program employs the scientific <br />14, methodology of the University of Michigan's American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) a <br />15 customer satisfaction metric for both government and the private sector. The ACSI measures <br />116 over two-thirds of the United States economy and produces scores for more than 100 federal <br />1 ��7 government agencies. In addition to asking questions regarding overall satisfaction, the survey <br />11 111",,'11 asks questions regarding actions the respondant is willing to take. The Index merges satisfaction <br />119 ratings with action ratings to determine an overall satisfaction rating. Roseville received a 72 on <br />2o a 100 point scale. The national average is 58. <br />21 <br />22 In the budgeting module, residents were asked to rate how important it is for the City to fund <br />23 specific programs and services. Residents were also asked which budgetary action they would <br />24, support if there was not adequate funding to provide each service. Choices were to: eliminate the <br />25 service, reduce service level, maintain current service level or raise taxes & fees. With this <br />26 information available, the City Council can better align community expectations and support for <br />27 the various City services and programs through the Priority Based budgeting process. <br />28 <br />29 William SaintAmour executive director of Cobalt Community Research will join us over the <br />30 internet for a presentation of the survey results. <br />31 <br />32 POLICY OBJECTIVE <br />33 The Imagine Roseville 2025 visioning process identified this strategy for Making Roseville a <br />34, Welcoming Community: <br />35 "Benchmark and routinely seek community input to evaluate and continuously improve <br />1) <br />36 city services ". <br />Page I of 2 <br />