2011-02-02_PC_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission Regular Board Meeting City Council Chambers, 2660 Civic Center Drive Minutes - Wednesday, February 02, 2011 1. Call to Order 1 Chair Dan Boerigter called to order the Planning Commission meeting at approximately 6:30 p.m. 2 and reviewed the role and purpose of the Planning Commission. 3 2. Roll Call & Introductions 4 City Planner Thomas Paschke called the Roll. 5 Members Present: Chair Daniel Boerigter; and Commissioners John Gisselquist; Joe 6 Wozniak; Thomas Gottfried; and Andre Best 7 Members Excused: Commissioner Glenn Cook 8 Staff present: City Planner Thomas Paschke; Associate Planner Bryan Lloyd; and City 9 Attorney Charles Bartholdi 10 3. Review of Minutes 11 MOTION 12 Member Boerigter moved, seconded by Member Gottfried to approve meeting minutes of 13 September 29, 2010, October 27, 2010, November 03, 2010, and December 01, 2010 as 14 presented. 15 Ayes: 5 16 Nays: 0 17 Motion carried. 18 4. Communications and Recognitions: 19 a. From the Public (Public Comment on items not on the agenda) 20 No one from the public appeared to speak at this time. 21 b. From the Commission or Staff 22 City Planner Paschke advised that the agenda needed to be amended to include election 23 of a Vice Chair. Chair Boerigter suggested adding this as an agenda item at the end of 24 the meeting. 25 5. Public Hearing 26 Chair Boerigter reviewed the purpose and process for public hearings before the Planning 27 Commission. 28 a. REFERRAL FROM THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS 29 City Planner Thomas Paschke briefly introduced the appeal from Woos Edge 30 Homeowners Association and Old Highway 8 Neighborhood residents regarding property 31 rejection of petition requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the land use 32 guidance for 3253 and 3261 Old Highway 8 (PF11-001). Mr. Paschke noted that the 33 petition was submitted to the Community Development Department on November 16, 34 2010; and requested that the City Council “…amend the Roseville Comprehensive Plan 35 to recommend medium density development with future zoning to be of a density no 36 greater than R-6 for 3253 and 3261 Old Highway 8.” Mr. Paschke reviewed the process 37 in review of the petition and subsequent City Attorney recommendation submitted as 38 “Attachment A” to the Request for Planning Commission Action materials dated February 39 2, 2011. 40 City Attorney Bartholdi was present at tonight’s meeting, and provided additional 41 background as detailed in the staff report as well as addressing the requests of the 42 appeal to the administrative decision to reject the petition (Attachment B of the staff 43 report) and reasons for the appeal of that administrative decision. In accordance with 44 State Statute, City Attorney reviewed the subsequent process of the City Council, acting 45