My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-06-01_PC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-06-01_PC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2011 2:27:58 PM
Creation date
12/20/2011 2:27:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/1/2011
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, June 1, 2011 <br />Page 4 <br />145 time to remain community-oriented. Mr. Winges advised that his firm would discuss the <br />146 fencing height and location with Ms. Gjertson prior to its installation. <br />147 Ms. Gjertson expressed concern about the asbestos in the existing building and how she <br />148 would be protected from it during demolition. <br />149 Mr. Winges advised that the asbestos had already been abated. <br />Unidentified Female Speaker, Alta Vista Drive and Roma <br />150 <br />151 The speaker referenced a trucking company using this parking lot a few years ago, and <br />152 starting early in the morning and driving north right past her home; and expressed <br />153 concern that similar issues would occur with this facility. The speaker opined that there <br />154 was currently a lot of traffic with school students and work traffic, as well as people going <br />155 to the park; and questioned the rationale for laying out the access points the way they <br />156 were, with traffic routed north, opining that it was not a public thoroughfare, but a <br />157 neighborhood street; and requested that a “No Left Turn” at the exit would correct the <br />158 situation and force people to go south. <br />159 Chair Boerigter observed that, whatever use was on the site, no one could go north, as <br />160 the two roads were currently laid out. Chair Boerigter noted that the Planning <br />161 Commission would make a recommendation to the City Council for their June 20, 2011 <br />162 meeting, but that a traffic study was proposed for completion prior to that meeting. <br />Kathy Marko, 1706 St. Albans Street N <br />163 <br />164 Ms. Marko expressed her concern with current traffic from the apartment building cutting <br />165 over to the left lane and trying to turn around; and expressed further concerns with <br />166 additional traffic from this facility. Ms. Marko expressed her concern for handicapped <br />167 people from the facility attempting to use the sidewalks, opining that it was very risky <br />168 there. <br />Janet Atz, 1736 Alta Vista Drive <br />169 <br />170 Ms. Atz stated that she was very concerned about traffic, with many children living in that <br />171 area and others from the neighborhood coming to play in the area and not used to having <br />172 lots of traffic of which to be aware. Ms. Atz noted that traffic has been increasing <br />173 considerably lately, since Reservoir Woods Park had opened up and even before this <br />174 proposed facility, and she was afraid someone was going to get hurt, especially with the <br />175 additional traffic during afternoon shift changes coinciding with children arriving home <br />176 from school. <br />Cherie Gallinati, 1729 Alta Vista Drive <br />177 <br />178 Ms. Gallinati noted that this was a small neighborhood, creating challenges and major <br />179 issues with neighbors currently whipping through the parking lot on this subject parcel to <br />180 get to Larpenteur Avenue. Ms. Gallinati expressed concern with multiple shift changes <br />181 during the day, in addition to visitors; adequacy and location of parking spaces; access <br />182 on Roma and Alta Vista for the neighborhood itself; and noise from the proposed facility <br />183 for the adjacent apartment building. Ms. Gallinati advised that she had viewed other Suite <br />184 Living facilities, and while lovely, they appeared to be built for 160 beds of more, and the <br />185 firm had no formula for this small of a facility yet; opining that this site was not a good site <br />186 for special needs/memory care clients, since the firm’s model had yet to be tested. <br />Mr. Bee Cha, 1708 St. Albans Street N <br />187 <br />188 Mr. Cha expressed concern regarding the site plan’s extensive east/west layout and <br />189 aesthetics; and suggested that the firm consider changing the roof to a hip roof rather <br />190 than a gable roof, or consider a standing metal roof with a lower pitch, to minimize the <br />191 site line of the roof. Mr. Cha further suggested that the building’s footprint be shifted in a <br />192 north/south direction to break down the scale. Mr. Cha opined that this was a quiet <br />193 neighborhood visually, as well as noise-related. <br />Ms. Cha, 1708 St. Albans Street N <br />194 <br />195 Ms. Cha questioned why the firm chose this site; and questioned if clients would be <br />196 recruited from Roseville or area-wide. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.