Laserfiche WebLink
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Tuesday, February 15, 2011 <br />Page 6 <br />1 <br />Ayes: 6 <br />2 <br />Nays: 0 <br />3 <br />Motion carried. <br />4 <br />5 <br />c.Former Consent Agenda Item: HRA Organizational Structure / Approve the service <br />6 <br />contract with the City of Roseville for staff support services (Housing Program <br />7 <br />Coordinator) for $62,517 prorated quarterly for 2011 <br />8 <br /> Executive Director Trudgeon advised that, in 2007, the Community Development Department <br />9 <br />was restructured to facilitate day to day operations of the HRA, with a portion of Mr. <br />10 <br />Trudgeon’s salary allocated for his service as the HRA’s Executive Director, and the creation <br />11 <br />of a new Housing Program Coordinator positions. Mr. Trudgeon advised that this model had <br />12 <br />worked well over the last three (3) years, and that great strides had been made using that <br />13 <br />structure. Mr. Trudgeon noted his work over the last few months with the City’s Finance <br />14 <br />Committee addressing overall City restructuring of staff positions and duties to better position <br />15 <br />the City and its respective departments to address future needs. <br />16 <br />17 <br /> Mr. Trudgeon provided the existing Job Description for the Housing Program Coordinator and <br />18 <br />the proposed Job Descriptions for the Housing Program Manager, both included in the Request <br />19 <br />for HRA Action dated February 15, 2011. Mr. Trudgeon noted that the existing Job <br />20 <br />Description didn’t include any mention of the Living Smarter Fair; day-to-day operations with <br />21 <br />the Executive Director of HRA functions; and other realities of the position and how it had <br />22 <br />evolved beyond the Coordinator position. Mr. Trudgeon advised that, with consensus by the <br />23 <br />Human Resources Director and City Manager, it had been determined that the position needed <br />24 <br />reclassified as proposed. Mr. Trudgeon advised that this did not represent any expansion of <br />25 <br />duties, but was reflective of actual and current work flows and relationships matching needs. <br />26 <br />27 <br /> Mr. Trudgeon advised that the financial impact for the proposed amendments based on salary <br />28 <br />and benefits, would be $1,600 and had been reflected in the amended budget to be addressed in <br />29 <br />the following agenda item. <br />30 <br />31 <br />Motion: Member Elkins moved, seconded by Member Quam to approve the 2011 RHRA <br />32 <br />Organizational Structure as presented and detailed in the Request for HRA Action dated <br />33 <br />February 15, 2011. <br />34 <br />35 <br />Ayes: <br />36 <br />Nays: 0 <br />37 <br />Motion carried. <br />38 <br />39 <br />d. Adopt Amended 2011 Budget <br />40 <br />Executive Director Trudgeon presented an amended 2011 HRA Budget, as detailed in the <br />41 <br />Request for HRA Action dated February 15, 2011. Mr. Trudgeon noted that the 2011 Budget <br />42 <br />had been initially prepared in August of 2010 for recommendation to the City Council for <br />43 <br />setting their Preliminary Levy in September of 2010; and obviously prior to the end of the <br />44 <br />2010 Budget year. Mr. Trudgeon reviewed the minor revisions to the 2011 Budget since that <br />45 <br />time, included an increase in cash carryover of unexpended funds in several programs; <br />46 <br />inclusion of new initiatives as previously discussed and adopted by the HRA; and lowered <br />47 <br />investment income projects. Mr. Trudgeon noted that the 2011 Budget and Levy remained as <br />48 <br />initially established, but the amendments were reallocated as indicated in the expense and <br />49 <br />revenue sections. <br />50 <br />51 <br />Mr. Trudgeon reviewed the highlighted expense reallocations for the Living Smarter Home <br />52 <br />and Garden Fair in its own category when previously shown as a General HRA expenditure; <br />53 <br />revisions in the new HRC contract showing loan closing costs; unexpended funds for the <br />54 <br />Green Book that was still being developed; and additional budget funds for the Live/Work <br />55 <br />program yet to be finalized. Mr. Trudgeon noted further reallocation for the NEP as costs for <br /> <br />