2011-08-16_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

HRA Meeting Minutes – June 21, 2011 Page 3 1 Current projects for PPL are: 2 Rental (44 1-3 bedroom units) at Snelling Avenue and West Seventh Street, a new 3 building with 10 units permanently designated for supportive housing for families meeting 4 the state’s definition as long-term homeless, or income restrictions for households earning 5 under 60% AMI; 6 Touchstone, 40 units of supportive housing for mentally ill people, located in the Seward 7 neighborhood of Minneapolis; with the building’s architecture designed with neuroscience 8 professionals to provide efforts for strategies to improve the lives of those individuals 9 through the building structure and amenities (e.g. additional windows, lighting, etc.); 10 Linden Place in New Hope, 33 rental units 11 Vail Place in St. Louis Park with 11, 1 bedroom units for single adults with mental illness; 12 and 13 Louisiana Court in St. Louis Park, a long-term (12 years in process) rehabilitated complex 14 with 128, 1-3 bedroom units total in 11 buildings, with household income restrictions 15 below 60% AMI. 16 17 Steve Cramer 18 Mr. Cramer advised that PPL often seeks to consolidate ownership for older, multi-family 19 buildings (similar to Louisiana Court project) and then establish comprehensive services 20 available to residents of those buildings. Mr. Cramer noted that, over the years, PPL had 21 learned many lessons in managing their buildings and services; and it had now come to fruition 22 in serving them well to transform that type of a building in a community so they once again 23 became an asset. 24 25 A discussion among Board members, presenters and staff ensued. 26 27 Member Quam questioned how PPL determined the criteria in site or project selection. 28 29 Mr. Cramer advised that the criteria varied; however, one found successful in suburban 30 locations such as Roseville was through working with the community to identify development 31 challenges that may only be solved through affordable or living wage housing development. 32 Mr. Cramer advised that other situations have included identifying nuisance properties in the 33 community and problem-solving in partnership with the community. Mr. Cramer addressed 34 current transit-oriented development that PPL was involved with in Minneapolis and St. Paul; 35 in addition to focusing on the foreclosure crisis, doing recovery work on smaller projects. 36 However, Mr. Cramer noted that each project was evaluated on its own merits to ensure that it 37 made sense from a development standpoint and provided a connection to the community with 38 PPL’s comprehensive services for its residents and for it to become an asset in the particular 39 neighborhood as well as to the community as a whole. 40 41 Member Quam questioned if those support services mentioned, such as class educational 42 opportunities, were offered on site or if PPL had additional space for providing those services. 43 44 Mr. Cramer advised that most out-of-school work time was offered on site where feasible; 45 however, he noted that PPL had a sufficient number of larger-scale buildings offering 46 community rooms, and since PPL had a fleet of vans, they could facilitate on-site or of-site 47 situations. Mr. Cramer advised that PPL currently had six (6) concentrations around the 48 metropolitan area for out-of-school programs; in addition to their administration/management 49 of some schools, although that was a different project area from work involving support 50 services for families in their housing facilities. 51 52 Member Quam asked if PPL had received any historic tax credits for financing; with Mr. 53 Cramer responding that none of PPL’s projects had been eligible to-date. 54